Binghamton, NY |
O'Brien, Daniel Tumminelli
2009 Sociality in the City: Using Biological Principles to Explore the Relationship Between High Population Density and Social Behavior. In Advances in Sociology Research, edited by Jared A. Jaworski, pp. 1-14, vol. 8. Nova Science Publishers. http://bnp.binghamton.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/OBrien-2010-Sociality-and-the-City-Proofs.pdf.
Wilson, David Sloan and Daniel Tumminelli O’Brien
2009 Evolutionary Theory and Cooperation in Everyday Life. In Games, Groups, and the Global Good, edited by Simon A. Levin, pp. 155-168. Springer, New York.
Wilson, David Sloan, Daniel Tumminelli O'Brien, and Artura Sesma
2009 Human Prosociality from an Evolutionary Perspective: Variation and Correlations at a City-Wide Scale. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(3):190-200.
Low income housing in Newcastle |
This is a fascinating talk. Nettle works in the field of behavioral ecology and evolutionary anthropology, and he applies these perspectives to differences in cooperation and social life in two neighborhoods in Newcastle. He describes the settings (a poor and a wealthy neighborhood) and investigates how three methodological approaches to cooperation and social behavior relate to one another: economic games, social capital surveys, and observation of behavior.
I have not read the Binghamton papers yet, but Nettle has got me thinking about how research on cooperation (one of the BIG TOPICS in both the social and biological sciences right now) relates to urban neighborhoods. What can neighborhoods tell us about human processes of cooperation? And what can cooperation within neighborhoods tell us about the Wide Urban World?
David Sloan Wilson has a book coming out this summer:
ReplyDeleteWilson, David Sloan
2011 The Neighborhood Project: Using Evolution to Improve my City, One Block at a Time. Little, Brown, New York.
The project was also just reviewed in a Nature News piece:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/110608/full/474146a.html
@ DTAE -- Thanks for the tip. After reading the piece in Nature and a couple of the articles, I couldn't figure out what natural selection has to do with the work in Binghamton. There is a nice discussion of different approaches to research on cooperation (economic games, natural selection, social capital models), but the discussion of different neighborhoods seems to relate pretty directly to basic social science concepts, not natural selection.
ReplyDeleteThe video of Daniel Nettle's lecture, on the other hand, does tie urban analysis much more closely to debates in evolutionary anthropology and biology. I am very interested to see how that research is reported and integrated with traditional social science approaches.